wolfenstein enemy territory on macbook 6.1

Wolfenstein enemy territory on macbook 6.1 movie#
Wolfenstein enemy territory on macbook 6.1 download#

Hint1: A movie projector shows you fully black screens 50% of the time, yet that doesn't bother anybody. I won't go into lengthy details, just look it up. The reason the tear-line doesn't matter at all is a fundamental principle of visual perception. (vertical syncing forces that line to always stay at Y=0 at the top of the screen, meaning you see only one frame) In reality, there will be a single 'tear' line going horizontally across the screen, with the prior frame above it and the current below. Your description is as if there was no such thing as hardware pageflipping. Surely it means that your monitor is showing two or more frames at once (eg the top 1/3 of your screen showing two frames ago, middle 1/3 showing one frame ago, bottom 1/3 showing current frame)? You said 'faster frame rate in numerical terms'. It's almost too simple to bother typing out: 'Because it gives higher frame rates'. Vertical-sync locking might hide the effect (positive or negative) of weirdly-labeled OpenGL options.īut there's another reason, so people may want to leave vsync disabled after figuring out the tweaks they want. So when starting to tweak for speed, you certainly have to be in a configuration where the effect of every setting changed can be detected. The first (and undisputable one) is that for scientific purposes of measuring system performance, you want to have as precise numbers as possible. (7) if that's not good enough go to and read how other people do it, there are tons of tricks. (6) in the quake 3 system window choose 'normal' or 'fast' (5) in the quake 3 system window lower the resolution to 1024x768, 800圆00 or 640x480 (i've always used 640x480). (3) set option for 'mipmap detail' to best performance (1) turn 'anisotropic filtering' off / set 'texture anisotropic setting' to 0 x.

he probably needs to change settings on his vidio card. Since it doesn't seem to be working for him he's doing something wrong. i get around 100 fps constant, which is perfectly fine. I've played q3 for 3 years on a p3 733mhz with a tnt2 and 384mb of ram. quake 1 should get a perfect 77 fps and quake 2 should get, i don't remember. Quake 3 should get a perfect 125 fps on a p4 1.7 Ghz. A team-based multiplayer FPS with a very deep and well-developed movement-and-combat model.

Wolfenstein enemy territory on macbook 6.1 download#

Download it once, and if nobody is playing, you'll always have it - when the next release comes out, you can autoupdate! Also, the team is very good about arranging regular scrimmages for everyone that is interested.

:) Great guys on that dev team, though - download the game, it comes with a modified version of a stable auto-updater program. Some might even argue that the game is nothing more than an independent resurrection of a type of gameplay that was accidentally (bug) introduced in the first game of a franchise, was LOVED TO PEICES by the fanbase and introduced thousands of players to the game, and then was nixed in the second installment because an arrogant jackass (*cough*he made Planetside*cough*) who got owned every time he played the game in multiplayer decided that player skill was overrated and unfair to the majority of players. It has rock-solid 32-player multiplayer, high fps, emboss terrain bump-mapping, and, most importantly - great, unique movement dynamics. There is a great game being developed with Garagegames' 'Torque' engine. While at 90 fps, you know that everything is going smoothly for you to get that high. Lower fps shows a deficiency on the computer to run the game properly, and in a low fps case, you know that if it's that low, then networking and other systems might be affected. Higher fps makes you a better player, gives faster response time, and allows less bottlenecking. 2/3rds of the frames the gamer gets are older than the ones the 90 fps guy gets, only 1/3 (every third) frames might match up with the new 90 fps the faster comp guy gets. People will see much faster updates at 90 fps, regardless of hz your mointor supports. 30 fps doesn't just mean less fps, it also means there's more time needed for the computer to draw that frame before showing it. There will be a laggier feel as opposed to the 90 fps. In a game, people will know the difference between 90 fps (fluidity) and 30 fps (not fluid around fast jerking around of mouse.) The person will FEEL the difference in speed.

If you are staring at the same thing that doesn't change, it won't matter if it updates 200 frames a second or 1 frame a second-YOU WON'T KNOW. However, when frames are refreshed (in a game), they do not 'dim'. If 85 hz means that for your monitor, pixels are refreshed before they even start dimming, then you won't ever be sick from it. Your monitor tries to do this at as fast hertz as possible. If they start dimming before they are refreshed, then you will notice slight blinking compared to looking at a piece of paper. Phosphors need to be refreshed before they expire.